Trends in Public Speaking

Tone in politics is not systematically related to macro trends, ideology, or experience

  • Soroka, S. N. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Külz, J., Spitz, A., Abu-Akel, A., Günnemann, S. & West, R. United States politicians’ tone became more negative with 2016 primary campaigns. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 10495 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lengauer, Günther., Esser, Frank & Berganza, Rosa. Negativity in political news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism 13(2), 179–202 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rhodes, J. H. & Vayo, A. B. The historical presidency: Fear and loathing in presidential candidate rhetoric, 1952–2016. Pres. Stud. Q. 49(4), 909–931 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Caryl, C. The world is awash in the politics of fear. The Washington post (2018).

  • Davies, W. How feelings took over the world. The Guardian (2018).

  • Freeman, J. America descends into the politics of rage. The Atlantic (2018).

  • Albert Arnold Gore. The Assault on Reason: How the Politics of Blind Faith Subvert Wise Decision-Making (The Penguin Press, 2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Erisen, C. & Villalobos, J. D. Exploring the invocation of emotion in presidential speeches. Contemp. Politics 20(4), 469–488 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ojala, Maria, Cunsolo, Ashlee, Ogunbode, Charles A. & Middleton, Jacqueline. Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: A narrative review. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46(1), 35–58 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stapleton, Carey E. & Dawkins, Ryan. Catching my anger: How political elites create angrier citizens. Political Res. Q. 75(3), 754–765 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Werlen, E., Imhof, C., & Bergamin, P. Emotions in the parliament: Lexical emotion analysis of parliamentarian speech transcriptions, in SwissText (2021).

  • Lau, R. R. & Pomper, G. M. Effects of negative campaigning on turnout in U.S. senate elections, 1988–1998. J. Politics 63(3), 804–819 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hobbs, William & Lajevardi, Nazita. Effects of divisive political campaigns on the day-to-day segregation of Arab and Muslim Americans. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 113(1), 270–276 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jordan, K. N., Sterling, J., Pennebaker, J. W. & Boyd, R. L. Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116(9), 3476–3481 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crabtree, C., Golder, M., Gschwend, T. & IndriĐason, I. H. It is not only what you say, it is also how you say it: The strategic use of campaign sentiment. J. Politics 82(3), 1044–1060 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Osnabrügge, M., Hobolt, S. B. & Rodon, T. Playing to the gallery: Emotive rhetoric in parliaments. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 115(3), 885–899 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wojcik, S. P., Hovasapian, A., Graham, J., Motyl, M. & Ditto, P. H. Conservatives report, but liberals display, greater happiness. Science 347(6227), 1243–1246 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kosmidis, S., Hobolt, S. B., Molloy, E. & Whitefield, S. Party competition and emotive rhetoric. Comp. Pol. Stud. 52(6), 811–837 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rheault, L., Beelen, K., Cochrane, C. & Hirst, G. Measuring emotion in parliamentary debates with automated textual analysis. PLoS one 11(12), e0168843 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwalbach, J. Going in circles? The influence of the electoral cycle on the party behaviour in parliament. Eur. Political Sci. Rev. 14, 1–20 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Valentim, V. & Widmann, T. Does radical-right success make the political debate more negative? Evidence from emotional rhetoric in German state parliaments. Political Behav. 45(1), 243–264 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Widmann, T. How emotional are populists really? Factors explaining emotional appeals in the communication of political parties. Polit. Psychol. 42(1), 163–181 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A. & Vanpaemel, W. Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11(5), 702–712 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haselmayer, Martin & Jenny, Marcelo. Sentiment analysis of political communication: Combining a dictionary approach with crowdcoding. Qual. Quant. 51(6), 2623–2646 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Russell, James A. A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39(6), 1161–1178 (1980).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lieberman, E., Michel, J. B., Jackson, J., Tang, T. & Nowak, M. A. Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature 449(7163), 713–716 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnson, E. Lexical Change and Variation in the Southeastern United States, 1930–1990 (University of Alabama Press, 1996).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kozlowski, A. C., Taddy, M., & Evans, J. A. the geometry of culture: Analyzing meaning through word embeddings. Am. Sociol. Rev. 000312241987713 (2019).

  • Rodman, E. A timely intervention: Tracking the changing meanings of political concepts with word vectors. Political Anal. 28, 1–25 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Brand, C. O., Acerbi, A. & Mesoudi, A. Cultural evolution of emotional expression in 50 years of song lyrics. Evol. Hum. Sci. 1, e11 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Iliev, R., Hoover, J., Dehghani, M. & Axelrod, R. Linguistic positivity in historical texts reflects dynamic environmental and psychological factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113(49), E7871–E7879 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Acerbi, A., Lampos, V., Garnett, P. & Bentley, R. A. The expression of emotions in 20th century books. PLoS one 8(3), 59030 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lim, E. T. The Anti-Intellectual Presidency: The Decline of Presidential Rhetoric from George Washington to George W. Bush (Oxford University Press, 2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Spirling, Arthur. Democratization and linguistic complexity: The effect of franchise extension on parliamentary discourse, 1832–1915. J. Politics 78(1), 120–136 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Teten, R. Evolution of the modern rhetorical presidency: Presidential presentation and development of the state of the union address. Pres. Stud. Q. 33(2), 333–346 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schoonvelde, Martijn, Brosius, Anna, Schumacher, Gijs & Bakker, Bert N. Liberals lecture, conservatives communicate: Analyzing complexity and ideology in 381,609 political speeches. PLoS one 14(2), e0208450 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Müller, W. C. & Strøm, K. Policy, Office, or Votes? (Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. Comparative economic voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy. Am. J. Political Sci. 30(2), 315 (1986).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Traber, D., Schoonvelde, M. & Schumacher, G. Errors have been made, others will be blamed: Issue engagement and blame shifting in prime minister speeches during the economic crisis in Europe. Eur. J. Political Res. 59(1), 45–67 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stimson, J. A. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings (Taylor and Francis, 1999).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Erikson, R. S., Mackuen, M. B. & Stimson, J. A. The Macro Polity (Cambridge University Press, 2001).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ekman, P. & Davidson, R. J. The Nature of Emotion (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1994).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Frey, B. S. & Stutzer, A. What can economists learn from happiness research?. J. Econ. Lit. 40(2), 402–435 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O. & Zweig, J. S. The happiness – Income paradox revisited. Proc. National Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107(52), 22463–22468 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B. & Alford, J. R. Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behav. Brain Sci. 37(3), 297–307 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tritt, S. M., Peterson, J. B., Page-Gould, E. & Inzlicht, M. Ideological reactivity: Political conservatism and brain responsivity to emotional and neutral stimuli. Emotion 16(8), 1172–1185 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sylwester, K. & Purver, M. Twitter language use reflects psychological differences between democrats and republicans. PLoS one 10(9), e0137422 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turetsky, K. M. & Riddle, T. A. Porous chambers, echoes of valence and stereotypes: A network analysis of online news coverage interconnectedness following a nationally polarizing race-related event. Soc. Psycholo. Personal. Sci. 9(2), 163–175 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hirsh, J. B. & Peterson, J. B. Personality and language use in self-narratives. J. Res. Pers. 43(3), 524–527 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, C. H., Kim, K., Young, S. S. & Chung, C. K. The relations between personality and language use. J. General Psychol. 134(4), 405–413 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pennebaker, James W. & King, Laura A. Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77(6), 1296–1312 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yarkoni, T. Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. J. Res. Pers. 44(3), 363–373 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Costa, Paul T. & McCrae, Robert R. Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38(4), 668–678 (1980).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Larsen, R. J. & Ketelaar, T. Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61(1), 132–140 (1991).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lucas, R. E. & Diener, E. D. Understanding extraverts’ enjoyment of social situations: The importance of pleasantness. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 81(2), 343–356 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pavot, W., Diener, E. D. & Fujita, F. Extraversion and happiness. Personal. Individ. Differ. 11(12), 1299–1306 (1990).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Words, O., Selves, O., James, W. P., Matthias, R. M. & Kate, G. N. Psychological aspects of natural language use. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54, 547–77 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bakker, B. N. Personality traits, income, and economic ideology. Polit. Psychol. 38(6), 1025–1041 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M. & Shang, E. H. Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 104(1), 111–133 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M. & Lelkes, Y. Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 106(6), 1031–1051 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fournier, P., Soroka, S. & Nir, Lilach. Negativity Biases and political ideology: A comparative test across 17 countries. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 114(3), 775–791 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C. & Arceneaux, K. Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4(6), 613–621 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ludeke, S., Tagar, M. R. & DeYoung, C. G. Not as different as we want to be: Attitudinally consistent trait desirability leads to exaggerated associations between personality and sociopolitical attitudes: Not as different as we want to be. Polit. Psychol. 37(1), 125–135 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hatemi, P. K., Crabtree, C. & Smith, K. B. Ideology justifies morality: Political beliefs predict moral foundations. Am. J. Political Sci. 63(4), 788–806 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hatemi, P. K. & Verhulst, B. Political attitudes develop independently of personality traits. PLoS one 10(3), e0118106 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ghodeswar, B. M. Building brand identity in competitive markets: A conceptual model. J. Product Brand Manag. 17(1), 4–12 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Whan Park, C. & Macinnis, D. J. Introduction to the special issue: Brand relationships, emotions, and the self. J. Assoc. Consum. Res. 3(2), 123–129 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Reeves, P., de Chernatony, L. & Carrigan, M. Building a political brand: Ideology or voter-driven strategy. J. Brand Manag. 13(6), 418–428 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L. & Müller, W. C. Who will attack the competitors? How political parties resolve strategic and collective action dilemmas in negative campaigning. Party Politics 23(6), 666–679 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diener, E. D., Sandvik, E. D. & Larsen, R. J. Age and sex effects for emotional intensity. Dev. Psychol. 21(3), 542–546 (1985).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gross, J. J. et al. Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychol. Aging 12(4), 590–599 (1997).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Frijda, N. H. The laws of emotion. Am. Psychol. 43(5), 349–358 (1988).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rauh, C., & Schwalbach, J. The ParlSpeech V2 data set: Full-text corpora of 6.3 million parliamentary speeches in the key legislative chambers of nine representative democracies. Harvard Dataverse, v2 edition (2020).

  • Volkens, A., Krause, W., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S., & Weßels, B. The manifesto data collection. Manifesto project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR) (2019).

  • Schumacher, G., Berk, N., Pipal, C., Kantorowicz, J., Schoonvelde, M., Traber, D., & Vries, E. D. EUSpeech V2 (2020).

  • Gennaro, G. & Ash, Elliott. Emotion and reason in political language. Econ. J. 132(643), 1037–1059 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, C., & He, Y. Joint sentiment/topic model for sentiment analysis, in International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings, 375–384 (2009).

  • Lin, C., He, Y., Everson, R. & Rüger, S. Weakly supervised joint sentiment-topic detection from text. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 24(6), 1134–1145 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pipal, C., Schoonvelde, M. & Schumacher, G. Taking Context Seriously: Joint Estimation of Sentiment and Topics in Textual Data (Publisher, OSF Preprint, 2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Young, L. & Soroka, S. Affective news: The automated coding of sentiment in political texts. Polit. Commun. 29(2), 205–231 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Proksch, S. O., Lowe, W., Wäckerle, J. & Soroka, S. Multilingual sentiment analysis: A new approach to measuring conflict in legislative speeches. Legis. Stud. Q. 44(1), 97–131 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Dolezal, M. & Müller, W. C. Gender differences in negative campaigning: The impact of party environments. Politics Gender 13, 81–106 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hargrave, L. & Langengen, T. The gendered debate: Do men and women communicate differently in the house of commons?. Politics Gender 17, 1–27 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Canes-Wrone, B. Who Leads Whom?: Presidents, Policy, and the Public (University of Chicago Press, UK, 2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lenz, G. S. Follow the Leader?: How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance (University of Chicago Press, 2012).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soroka, S. N. & Wlezien, C. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy (Cambridge University Press, 2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • OECD. OECD Stat: Quarterly national accounts (2019).

  • Döring, H., & Manow, P. Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections, and cabinets in modern democracies. Infrastruct. Empir. Inf. Parties Elections Gov. Mod. Democr. Version 12(10) (2015).

  • Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P. & Nelson, L. D. Specification curve analysis. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4(11), 1208–1214 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Proksch, S. O. & Slapin, J. B. The Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

    Book 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bäck, H. & Debus, M. When do women speak? A comparative analysis of the role of gender in legislative debates. Political Stud. 67(3), 576–596 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bäck, H., Baumann, M., Debus, M. & Müller, J. The unequal distribution of speaking time in parliamentary-party groups. Legis. Stud. Q. 44(1), 163–193 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Takens, J., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Van Hoof, A. & Van Atteveldt, W. Party leaders in the media and voting behavior: Priming rather than learning or projection. Polit. Commun. 32(2), 249–267 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flachaire, E. A better way to bootstrap pairs. Econ. Lett. 64(3), 257–262 (1999).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y. & Jordan, M. I. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(4–5), 993–1022 (2003).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lison, P., & Tiedemann, J. OpenSubtitles2016: Extracting large parallel corpora from movie and TV subtitles, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2016, 923–929 (2016).

  • Carmody, S. ngramr: Retrieve and plot Google n-gram data, January (2023).

  • Álvarez-Daz, Á., Gonzlez, L. & Radcliff, B. The politics of happiness: On the political determinants of quality of life in the American states. J. Politics 72(3), 894–905 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pacek, A. & Radcliff, B. Assessing the welfare state: The politics of happiness. Perspect. Politics 6, 267–277 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tavits, M. Representation, corruption, and subjective well-being. Comp. Pol. Stud. 41(12), 1607–1630 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ward, G. Happiness and Voting: Evidence from four decades of elections in Europe. Am. J. Political Sci. 64(3), 504–518 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lowe, W., Benoit, K., Slava, M. & Laver, M. Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legis. Stud. Q. 36(1), 123–155 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dalton, R. J. The quantity and the quality of party systems: Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comp. Pol. Stud. 41(7), 899–920 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bernardi, L., Bischof, D. & Wouters, R. The public, the protester, and the bill: Do legislative agendas respond to public opinion signals?. J. Eur. Public Policy 28(2), 1–22 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • De Boef, S. & Keele, L. Taking time seriously. Am. J. Political Sc. 52(1), 184–200 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Andreevskaia, A., & Bergler, S. Mining WordNet for fuzzy sentiment: Sentiment tag extraction from WordNet glosses, in EACL 2006 – 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference 209–216 (2006).

  • Subasic, P. & Huettner, A. Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 9(4), 483–496 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Atteveldt, W., Van der Velden, M. A. & Boukes, M. The validity of sentiment analysis: Comparing manual annotation, crowd-coding, dictionary approaches, and machine learning algorithms. Commun. Methods Measures 15(2), 121–140 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Widmann, T. & Wich, M. Creating and comparing dictionary, word embedding, and transformer-based models to measure discrete emotions in German political text. Political Anal. 31, 1–16 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     


  • Source link

    Related Articles

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Back to top button